Repository navigation
Publication package: manuscript, editable architecture, latent-loss ablation - #2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…d visual narrative
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
w_lat=0versus1) via train_jepa, standalone runner and regression tests.Scientific integrity
No new empirical results are claimed. The prior GRU horizon fix is merged into main, but its full benchmark has not been rerun. The single-split ablation runner is exploratory only; multi-seed subject-level CV, confidence intervals and external validation remain required before a strong journal submission.
Review
Please gate merge on GitHub Actions test results. Existing experimental figures/results are preserved for provenance, not silently replaced.