Skip to content

Split documentation for Elements/Bitcoin/Unchained #54

Description

@schoen

Related to #37.

All documentation needs to be reviewed to ensure it's applicable to each deployment. The biggest difference is in jets (both the jet documentation itself and any code examples that make use of jets, e.g. to check asset types).

We have a built-in feature in Material for MkDocs where we can create tabs like

=== "Elements"

    Documentation for Elements integration goes here.

=== "Bitcoin Signet"

    Documentation for Bitcoin integration goes here.

This works great.

Asking DeepWiki about pages that are Elements-specific also seems to return a thorough answer. It's not too bad so far. Also, git grep jet:: in the repository doesn't show very many code examples that use Elements-specific jets at present.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions