Add GitLab build and unit-test shadows for Windows and Linux by NachoEchevarria · Pull Request #9512 · DataDog/dd-trace-dotnet

NachoEchevarria · 2026-10-23T09:21:59Z

Summary of changes

Add non-blocking Windows and Linux x64/ARM64 build and unit-test pipelines, reusing NUKE framework selection. Include native tests, CI Visibility telemetry, and automatic Windows image availability checks.

Reason for change

Begin validating build and unit-test parity while Azure remains authoritative. Integration tests and release-publication migration are out of scope.

Implementation details

NUKE generates per-framework child pipelines. Managed-test jobs reuse producer artifacts with --UnitTestFrameworkOnly; Windows images are published manually after review and reused when available.

Test coverage

Local NUKE compilation, matrix-selection checks, and YAML, PowerShell, and shell validation passed.

A manual run with run_all_test_frameworks=true passed: parent pipeline, build/unit-test shadow. All 12 build/generation jobs and 42 managed-test jobs passed (Windows: 10; Linux x64 glibc/musl: 18; Linux ARM64 glibc/musl: 14). Compared with reduced PR matrices, this additionally covers .NET Core 3.0 and .NET 5–8 on Windows/Linux x64, and .NET 7–8 on Linux ARM64.

Other details

See .gitlab/GitlabMigrationNotes.md for the shadow's scope and operational notes.

pr-commenter · 2026-10-23T10:15:12Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-10-28 15:27:30

Comparing candidate commit 214182e in PR branch nacho/GitlabBuildUnitWinLinux with baseline commit c263eee in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 1 unstable metrics, 13 known flaky benchmarks, 113 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

unstable execution_time [+8.177ms; +30.193ms] or [+4.518%; +16.683%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472

🟥 throughput [-8505.110op/s; -7721.000op/s] or [-6.806%; -6.178%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-31.844µs; -21.472µs] or [-9.409%; -6.344%]
🟩 throughput [+199.560op/s; +290.145op/s] or [+6.735%; +9.793%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

🟩 execution_time [-15.972µs; -11.876µs] or [-6.737%; -5.009%]
🟩 throughput [+223.563op/s; +297.224op/s] or [+5.296%; +7.041%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

unstable execution_time [-103.182ms; -33.994ms] or [-20.005%; -6.591%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

unstable execution_time [-117.470ms; -32.578ms] or [-25.070%; -6.953%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

unstable execution_time [-31230.743µs; +30603.423µs] or [-6.129%; +6.006%]
unstable throughput [-104.298op/s; -34.129op/s] or [-17.631%; -5.769%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

unstable execution_time [-223.615µs; -8.873µs] or [-11.828%; -0.469%]
unstable throughput [+19.163op/s; +151.137op/s] or [+3.622%; +28.568%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

🟩 throughput [+31513.937op/s; +33574.335op/s] or [+11.577%; +12.334%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

🟩 throughput [+14221.381op/s; +16845.275op/s] or [+5.257%; +6.227%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

unstable execution_time [-4.551µs; +1.351µs] or [-8.137%; +2.416%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

unstable execution_time [+0.833µs; +6.239µs] or [+1.600%; +11.982%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

unstable execution_time [+22.655ms; +93.759ms] or [+5.138%; +21.264%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

🟥 throughput [-15955089.082op/s; -15501679.336op/s] or [-6.537%; -6.351%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0
scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot · 2026-10-23T10:16:09Z

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9512) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-26T10:02:08Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-28T14:38:20.568484Z	`214182e`	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

NachoEchevarria · 2026-10-27T10:23:30Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

…taDog/dd-trace-dotnet into nacho/GitlabBuildUnitWinLinux

NachoEchevarria · 2026-10-28T11:29:01Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-28T11:33:10Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming!

Reviewed commit: bfe01fa79f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

datadog-datadog-prod-us1

More details

The completed static review produced no reportable findings. YAML parsing and shell syntax validation support the assessment, but Windows PowerShell execution and end-to-end GitLab pipeline behavior remain unverified.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 214182e}

Linux and Windows builds and unit tests in Gitlab

3453a49

NachoEchevarria changed the title ~~Linux and Windows builds and unit tests in Gitlab~~ Add GitLab build and unit-test shadows for Windows and Linux Oct 23, 2026

NachoEchevarria added the area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages label Oct 23, 2026

NachoEchevarria added 7 commits October 23, 2026 14:54

fix

fc2930d

Update .gitlab-ci.yml

6a4ff94

Update build-unit-tests.yml

52bad5b

refactor sdk

c659547

Update UPDATING_IMAGE.md

3b98fbd

pin image

eb1cd71

run_nuke refactor

078eaae

NachoEchevarria added 4 commits October 26, 2026 15:25

refactor

348c3da

Delete validate-unit-test-matrices.ps1

d8f1d65

Update Build.Gitlab.UnitTests.cs

55955ff

Create GitlabMigrationNotes.md

f9be3d1

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Oct 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .gitlab-ci.yml

Comment thread .gitlab/windows-unit-tests-child.yml Outdated

NachoEchevarria added 11 commits October 27, 2026 11:51

refactor

424ff0f

Refactor image-hash

bb28d88

refactor image building script

038090a

comment

d850159

update image manual

9ab1843

CI_JOB_ID

7a1ce1b

update notes

3f8878c

Multiple fixes

82ac953

multiple fixes

9e33931

fixes

01dcd85

clean up

dc3f8e4

NachoEchevarria and others added 8 commits October 27, 2026 15:26

Merge branch 'master' into nacho/GitlabBuildUnitWinLinux

533d052

Simplify test

f4fcfdf

Merge branch 'nacho/GitlabBuildUnitWinLinux' of https://github.com/Da…

d5930ce

…taDog/dd-trace-dotnet into nacho/GitlabBuildUnitWinLinux

simplify

4430777

Update generate-unit-tests-pipelines.ps1

747afcf

Fix error

441ab53

Update Build.Steps.cs

06dac10

cleanup

bfe01fa

Merge branch 'master' into nacho/GitlabBuildUnitWinLinux

c70f7c9

NachoEchevarria added 2 commits October 28, 2026 12:42

update notes

197b797

update notes

214182e

NachoEchevarria marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2026 14:35

NachoEchevarria requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2026 14:35

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot reviewed Oct 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Conversation

NachoEchevarria commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Unstable benchmarks

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

Known flaky benchmarks

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

Uh oh!

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

NachoEchevarria commented Oct 27, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

NachoEchevarria commented Oct 28, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 28, 2026

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

This branch has not been deployed

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

NachoEchevarria commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading