[Sword-Smith]

No description provided.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

1 warning, 1 note

⚠️ 41 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 2 benchmarks have no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: most of the time was spent in runtime internals, which would leave nothing useful to analyze.

See affected benchmarks

✅ 204 untouched benchmarks
🆕 4 new benchmarks
⏩ 2 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
🆕	sponges[64]	N/A	204.6 µs	N/A
🆕	sponges[64]	N/A	204.8 µs	N/A
🆕	columns_x_rows[400x512]	N/A	66.2 ms	N/A
🆕	columns_x_rows[88x512]	N/A	43.4 ms	N/A

---

_{Comparing thv/absorb-many (b923627) with master (63a8a4d)}

Footnotes

1. 2 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[coveralls]

coverage: 89.281% (-0.8%) from 90.096% — thv/absorb-many into master