In Table 3, "Specification of SMC Metadata", SMC Record is described as:
[IRI] https://admin-shell.io/idta/TimeSeries/Record/1/1
preferredName @de: Zeitreihen-Datensatz
preferredName @en: Time series record
definition @de: Ein Zeitreihen-Datensatz ist durch seine ID
innerhalb der Zeitreihe eindeutig und beinhaltet die auf die
ID referenzierten Zeitstempel und Variablenwerte
definition @en: A time series record is unique by its ID
within the time series and contains the timestamps and
variable values referenced to the ID
ordered = true
allowDuplicated = true
However, neither the .aasx file nor a .json export include an "ordered" attribute. Furthermore, to my best understanding of the meta-model, v. 3.1.1, such an attribute doesn't exist. In fact, p. 56 of the Part I of the AAS specification (v. 3.1.1), states:
Note: the elements within a submodel element collection are not ordered. Every element has a unique ID (its
"idShort"). However, it is recommended to adhere to the order defined in the submodel template.
I.e., elements of a SMC cannot be ordered. Hence, the description of SMC Record in the specification document for SMT Time Series Data is misleading and should be deleted.
In Table 3, "Specification of SMC Metadata", SMC Record is described as:
However, neither the .aasx file nor a .json export include an "ordered" attribute. Furthermore, to my best understanding of the meta-model, v. 3.1.1, such an attribute doesn't exist. In fact, p. 56 of the Part I of the AAS specification (v. 3.1.1), states:
I.e., elements of a SMC cannot be ordered. Hence, the description of SMC Record in the specification document for SMT Time Series Data is misleading and should be deleted.