Skip to content

server: treat a zero-capacity storage pool as full - #14052

Open
nagaboinaramgopal wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
nagaboinaramgopal:fix/storagepool-zero-capacity-nan
Open

server: treat a zero-capacity storage pool as full#14052
nagaboinaramgopal wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
nagaboinaramgopal:fix/storagepool-zero-capacity-nan

Conversation

@nagaboinaramgopal

Copy link
Copy Markdown

checkUsagedSpace divided used by total capacity without guarding a zero total. A pool reporting capacityBytes == 0 with zero used produced NaN, and NaN >= threshold is false, so the method returned true and reported that a pool with no capacity had space, letting allocation or resize proceed onto it. Return false when the pool reports no capacity.

Tested: new unit test checkUsagedSpaceReturnsFalseForZeroCapacityPool (fails before, passes after); StorageManagerImplTest green.

checkUsagedSpace divided used by total capacity without guarding a zero total.
A pool reporting capacityBytes == 0 (freshly added, stats not yet populated)
with zero used produced NaN, and NaN >= threshold is false, so the method
returned true and reported that a pool with no capacity had space, letting
allocation or resize proceed onto it. Return false when the pool reports no
capacity.

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is a long shot but a negative value may have been entered in the DB and coming back through a VO, so clgtm.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 19.78%. Comparing base (b7a834b) to head (7114e88).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ain/java/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java 50.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #14052      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     19.78%   19.78%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    19998    19996       -2     
============================================
  Files          6371     6371              
  Lines        575899   575901       +2     
  Branches      70495    70496       +1     
============================================
- Hits         113967   113959       -8     
- Misses       449501   449512      +11     
+ Partials      12431    12430       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.53% <ø> (ø)
unittests 21.06% <50.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@abh1sar abh1sar self-assigned this Sep 7, 2026
@abh1sar abh1sar moved this from Backlog to In progress in CloudStack Testing Sep 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: In progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants