Add 'all' encompassing optional dependency

[A-CGray]

Purpose

Adds the ability to install all optional dependencies using pip install pyoptsparse[all].

I updated the build_real.sh script used by Azure to use this flag when installing pyoptsparse so that we are testing all of pyoptsparse's optional dependencies, not sure if we should do the same in the GHA workflows?

Expected time until merged

2 weeks

Type of change

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (non-backwards-compatible fix or feature)
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
• Documentation update
• Maintenance update
• Other (please describe)

Testing

Test pip install -e .[all] locally with success.

Checklist

• I have run ruff check and ruff format to make sure the Python code adheres to PEP-8 and is consistently formatted
• I have formatted the Fortran code with fprettify or C/C++ code with clang-format as applicable
• I have run unit and regression tests which pass locally with my changes
• I have added new tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 54.22%. Comparing base (f8d344c) to head (dc41d0b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #499   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.22%   54.22%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         225      225           
=======================================
  Hits          122      122           
  Misses        103      103           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ewu63]

What are we missing with the previous [optview,testing] set? We don't need dev/docs right? Agree that GHA should adopt a similar set but I still think it just needs optview/testing.

[A-CGray]

What are we missing with the previous [optview,testing] set? We don't need dev/docs right? Agree that GHA should adopt a similar set but I still think it just needs optview/testing.

I think [optview,testing] covers everything explicitly required for CI, I just thought it might be good to use [all] so we're testing all of the different optional dependencies. I can go either way on that though.