Conversation
Member
|
Would you include that in a test? Does not have to be a new one. You could just add the extras into an existing one. |
Contributor
Author
|
I will do this when I get around to it |
Contributor
Author
|
@jakob-r this has tests now, you can merge it when / if you are making a new release for CRAN... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow things like
makeMBOControl( impute.y.fun = function(x, y, opt.path, ...) { structure(-log(1/4), extras = list(metainfo = 2)) # log loss of dumbest possible prediction for 4 classes (i.e. nucleotide prediction) }, ... )otherwise, setting extras attribute in the actual function gives an error whenever a value is imputed, since opt.path doesn't allow points to have missing "extra(s)" for individual points.