AI Search Gap: Execute Code After HTML5 Parameter Editors Render - #2243
Open
dessyordanova wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
dessyordanova wants to merge 1 commit into
dessyordanova wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Decision Recommend with confirmation — Document the lifecycle distinction and confirm whether the product should expose a public post-parameter-render event. Confidence: Medium Gap: Missing example or troubleshooting Why Customer need: Run code once when parameter controls are actually available. Current gap: Existing event documentation describes template readiness, UI updates, and report rendering, but not parameter-editor DOM readiness. Preferred approach: Add a dedicated documented event after parameter-editor creation, with a one-time usage example. Not selected: Recommending ready or updateUi again, because local source and reported behavior show they do not provide the required contract.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Decision
Recommend with confirmation — Document the lifecycle distinction and confirm whether the product should expose a public post-parameter-render event. Confidence: Medium
Gap: Missing example or troubleshooting
Why
Customer need: Run code once when parameter controls are actually available. Current gap: Existing event documentation describes template readiness, UI updates, and report rendering, but not parameter-editor DOM readiness. Preferred approach: Add a dedicated documented event after parameter-editor creation, with a one-time usage example. Not selected: Recommending ready or updateUi again, because local source and reported behavior show they do not provide the required contract.