🤖 Update Mock Benchmark Results

[thomhurst]

Automated Mock Benchmark Update

This PR updates the mock benchmark documentation with the latest results from the Mock Benchmarks workflow.

Benchmarks Produced

Individual benchmark artifacts are available for download:

• mock-benchmark-MockCreation
• mock-benchmark-Setup
• mock-benchmark-Invocation
• mock-benchmark-Verification
• mock-benchmark-Callback
• mock-benchmark-CombinedWorkflow
• mock-benchmark-summary (aggregated overview)

Libraries Compared

Libraries are discovered dynamically from the benchmark output. See the generated summary.json for the full list.

Changes

• Updated mock benchmark data in docs/static/benchmarks/mocks/latest.json
• Regenerated mock benchmark documentation in docs/docs/benchmarks/mocks/
• Updated mock benchmark summary in docs/static/benchmarks/mocks/summary.json

Workflow Run

• Run ID: 36512154062
• Triggered: schedule

---

🤖 This PR was automatically created and will be merged automatically once CI checks pass.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-29T02:37:43.158386Z	40b6c2a	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[github-actions]

Review

This is an automated mock-benchmark refresh. It touches only generated docs (docs/docs/benchmarks/mocks/*.md) and data (docs/static/benchmarks/mocks/*.json), with no source or logic changes.

• The dates and timestamps are consistent, and the tables, mermaid chart axes and JSON all moved together.
• Absolute timings differ from the previous run (some are faster, some slower). This looks like ordinary runner variance, so the numbers shouldn't be read as regressions or improvements.
• I found no correctness or design concerns, and there are no earlier review comments to check.

LGTM.

[greptile-apps]

Confidence Score: 5/5

[Low risk] Updates benchmark documentation with new test results.

The PR appears safe to merge; no actionable issue was identified in the refreshed benchmark artifacts.

Summary

Updates the mock benchmark documentation and JSON data with results from the September 29 scheduled run.

• Refreshes results for six categories across six libraries.
• Keeps category pages, charts, aggregate data, and timestamps consistent.

_{Reviews (1) · Last reviewed commit: "chore: update mock benchmark results"}